Speech, Signal, Symptom:
AI and the Limits of Technosolutionist Listening in American Mental Healthcare

How is AI shaping the sensory practices and ethical sensibilities of contemporary American mental healthcare? My current book project explores this question through an ethnographic investigation of efforts to embed voice analysis technologies, especially “vocal biomarker AI,” into American mental healthcare research and practice in an attempt transform how people who interface with the mental healthcare system are listened to.

Speech, Signal, Symptom (under contract, University of Chicago Press) maps the complex and contradictory ways that machine listening technologies retrench, rather than reorient, the American mental healthcare system’s dominant interpretive paradigms and thresholds of viability. At the same time, it turns up the volume on the self-reflexive critiques and strategic maneuverings that people engaged in constructing these technologies—from data annotators to human research subjects—develop through their perspective as the ones most responsible for iteratively transducing speech into computationally tractable and clinically valuable signals. In so doing, the book articulates the stakes and limitations of framing America’s mental health crisis as a computational problem that can be resolved through techno-sensory means alone.

Research from this project was funded by the National Science Foundation, the Wenner-Gren Foundation, and the Society for Psychological Anthropology. It has been published in Science, Technology, & Human Values, Somatosphere, the AI Now Institute’s A New Lexicon of AI series, the edited volume Technocreep and the Politics of Things Not Seen (May 2025), and will appear in a forthcoming issue of Current Anthropology.

Sounds Suspect: The Paranoid Past and Present of Computerized Voice Stress Analysis

Drawing from archival and ethnographic research, my second project examines the history and present-day use of computerized voice-based lie detection in policing and security contexts in the United States. I presented preliminary findings of this project at the 2021 SIGCIS conference and the 2021 Society for the Social Studies of Science Annual Meeting.

Public Scholarship

To read more of my thoughts on anthropological collaborations with tech workers, check out my interview of visual artist and computer scientist Jonathan Zong. The interview was part of an online series about digital psychiatry that I co-edited with Dörte Bemme and Natassia Brenman. To close the series, directed by River Ujhadbor and Dörte Bemme, we co-produced a podcast episode on digital exclusions and digital mental health care.

I served as a subject matter expert for an Access Now report, written by Xiaowei Wang and Shazeda Ahmed on the risks of emerging biometric technologies.

In 2020, with over 20 other academic and technology workers and the Coalition for Critical Technology, I co-wrote and facilitated an open letter condemning the development of computational, physiognomic models for “predicting criminality.” If you would like to use the letter for teaching purposes, you may download this accessible PDF. I was a participant of a 2019 Alex Trebek Forum for Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence and Mental Health Care at the University of Ottawa and co-organized “#AICantFixThis: MIT, Imperialism, and the Future of AI,” a teach-in at MIT.